Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5983431
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T22:13:48+00:00 2026-05-22T22:13:48+00:00

I thought that I might be able to do this with quotations – but

  • 0

I thought that I might be able to do this with quotations – but I can’t see how.

Should I just use a table of the functions with their names – or is their a way of doing this?

Thanks.

For more info……

I’m calling a lot of f# functions from excel and I wondered if I could write a f# function

let fs_wrapper (f_name:string) (f_params:list double) =
this bit calls fname with f_params

and then use

=fs_wrapper(“my_func”, 3.14, 2.71)

in the sheet rather than wrap all the functions separately.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T22:13:48+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 10:13 pm

    You’ll need to use standard .NET Reflection to do this. Quotations aren’t going to help, because they represent function calls using standard .NET MethodInfo, so you’ll need to use reflection anyway. The only benefit of quotations (compared to naive reflection) is that you can compile them, which could give you better performance (but the compilation isn’t perfect).

    Depending on your specific scenario (e.g. where are the functions located), you’d have to do something like:

    module Functions =
      let sin x = sin(x)
      let sqrt y = sqrt(y)
    
    open System.Reflection
    
    let moduleInfo = 
      Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().GetTypes()
      |> Seq.find (fun t -> t.Name = "Functions")
    
    let name = "sin"
    moduleInfo.GetMethod(name).Invoke(null, [| box 3.1415 |])
    

    Unless you need some extensibility or have a large number of functions, using a dictionary containing string as a key and function value as the value may be an easier option:

    let funcs = 
      dict [ "sin", Functions.sin;
             "sqrt", Functions.sqrt ]
    
    funcs.[name](3.1415)
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I thought that layout is just a widget that keeps more widgets inside. But
I haven't seen this addressed yet, but I think that might be because I
Got an interesting oddity - thought someone might be able to help. This came
I am trying to replicate TryParse for generic types and thought that TypeDescriptor might
Does that title sound confusing? I thought it might well anyways. When I person
I thought that a 32-bit process could use at most 2GB RAM, since half
I thought that this was easier… I have a asp:hyperlink control, with target=_blank ,
I thought that in principle Haskell's type system would forbid calls to impure functions
This question might be asked before but I couldn't solve my problem with those
I have a view that displays some movie data. I thought that it might

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.