Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6065137
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T09:21:26+00:00 2026-05-23T09:21:26+00:00

I thought this was going to be super easy but it has resulted in

  • 0

I thought this was going to be super easy but it has resulted in the need for more checks than i would like.

I have this code so far:

        if (funcType == "Mul")
            return (val1 * val2) <= int.MaxValue && (val1 * val2) >= int.MinValue;

        if (funcType == "Add")
            return (val1 + val2) <= int.MaxValue && (val1 + val2) >= int.MinValue;

        if (funcType == "Sub")
            return (val1 - val2) <= int.MaxValue && (val1 - val2) >= int.MinValue;

        if (funcType == "Div")
            return (val1 / val2) <= int.MaxValue && (val1 / val2) >= int.MinValue;

I need to check if when the calculations result in a number within the range of the int value type.

For example

int val1 = 1777777774;
int val2 = 477778777;

When added together the result is -2039410745 (a valid int)
But this is not the correct answer (so to speak) and so the check is not working as desired.

I suppose i could declare val1 and val2 as longs to prevent the negative results and then do the comparison.

Would this be safe (i’d still be worried about the result hitting limits when doing multiplication), is there a better way that you could think of?

Many thanks,
Kohan.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T09:21:26+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 9:21 am

    Convert one of the arguments to a long first, then the entire calculation will use 64-bit integers.

    There’s no danger of overflow so long as your original arguments remain typed as int: long.MaxValue has more than twice the magnitude of int.MaxValue * int.MaxValue, similarly with long.MinValue and int.MinValue * int.MaxValue.

    long longVal1 = (long)val1;
    
    if (funcType == "Mul")
        return (longVal1 * val2) <= int.MaxValue && (longVal1 * val2) >= int.MinValue;
    
    if (funcType == "Add")
        return (longVal1 + val2) <= int.MaxValue && (longVal1 + val2) >= int.MinValue;
    
    if (funcType == "Sub")
        return (longVal1 - val2) <= int.MaxValue && (longVal1 - val2) >= int.MinValue;
    
    if (funcType == "Div")
        return (longVal1 / val2) <= int.MaxValue && (longVal1 / val2) >= int.MinValue;
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I thought this would be fairly easy, but I'm totally baffled. I want one
I thought this would be pretty easy but I'm running into all sorts of
Super quick question, my initial thought was this is not going to work, but
I thought this was going to be easy, but it's turning into quite a
ancestor::foo[bar[@attr=val]] I thought this would work, but it's not. I need to find the
Initially I thought this was going to work, but now I understand it won't
Ok, this has been an on-going annoyance, so naturally I thought to bring it
I thought this would be fairly simple but it turns out not to work
I thought this would be very easy. I downloaded the JDK, extracted src.zip, modified
I thought this was going to be pretty simple, but I've been struggling with

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.