Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6353475
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T22:25:13+00:00 2026-05-24T22:25:13+00:00

I took this test on http://jsperf.com/literal-obj-vs-function-obj and Literal wins on FF6, Opera 10, IE8,

  • 0

I took this test on http://jsperf.com/literal-obj-vs-function-obj and Literal wins on FF6, Opera 10, IE8, but the Function method faster on Chrome 13.0.782.112, so which one is a better method to use?

var A = {
    aa : function(){
        var i, j=[];
        var arr = ['Literal', 'Function'];
        for (i = 0; i < arr.length; i++){
            j[i] = arr[i];
        }
       return j[0];
    }
};
var A1 = A;
var A2 = A1;
A1.foo = ' Test';
alert(A1.aa() + A2.foo);

//Function test
function B(){
    this.bb = function(){
        var i, j=[];
        var arr = ['Literal', 'Function'];
        for (i = 0; i < arr.length; i++){
            j[i] = arr[i];
        }
        return j[1];
    }
}
var B1 = new B();
var B2 = new B();
B.prototype.foo = ' Test';
alert(B1.bb() + B2.foo);
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T22:25:14+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 10:25 pm

    To tell you the truth, the best that I have found is a mix:

    function C() {
        var i, j = [],
            foo;
    
        return {
            bb: function() {
    
                var arr = ['Literal', 'Function'];
                for (i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
                    j[i] = arr[i];
                }
                return j[1];
            },
            setFoo: function(val) {
                foo = val;
            },
            getFoo: function() {
                return foo;
            }
        }
    }
    var C1 = C();
    var C2 = C();
    C2.setFoo(' Test');
    console.log(C1.bb(), C2.getFoo());
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I called this function once per frame and it took my FPS from >400
Im using this code http://platinumdogs.wordpress.com/2008/10/30/net-c-impersonation-with-network-credentials/#comment-770 to connect from a machine in the domain to
So let's say I have an ElasticSearch index defined like this: curl -XPUT 'http://localhost:9200/test'
This took me a while to figure out and I found the answer on
I took the plunge this afternoon and began studying LINQ, so far just mucking
I want to display a This page took x seconds widget at the bottom
I took a look at this answer and it goes in part to solving
This semester, I took a course in computer graphics at my University. At the
It took me forever to reduce the problem to this. I cannot express the
I’m posting this because it took me ages to fix and I could find

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.