Question

I tried many times doing a

git pull

and it says the branch is not specified. So the answer in How do you get git to always pull from a specific branch? seems to work.

But I wonder, why doesn’t Git default to master branch? If nothing is specified, doesn’t it make sense to mean the master branch?

Answer 1

git tries to use sensible defaults for git pull based on the branch that you’re currently on. If you get the error you refer to from git pull while you’re on master, that means you haven’t configured an upstream branch for master. In many situations this will be configured already – for example, when you clone from a repository, git clone will set up the origin remote to point to that repository and set up master with origin/master as upstream, so git pull will Just Work™.

However, if you want to do that configuration by hand, you can do so with:

 git branch --set-upstream master origin/master

… although as of git 1.8.0 you should use --set-upstream-to, since the former usage is not deprecated due to be confusingly error-prone. So, for git 1.8.0 and later you should do:

 git branch --set-upstream-to origin/master

Or you could likewise set up the appropriate configuration when pushing with:

 git push -u origin master

… and git pull will do what you want.