Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 668357
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T00:01:50+00:00 2026-05-14T00:01:50+00:00

I tried using Exist and IN. Not only did I not succeed, it didn’t

  • 0

I tried using “Exist” and “IN”. Not only did I not succeed, it didn’t seem as an efficient solution.

Here is a simplified example:

TblMyTable

UserName1  –  Grade  –  UserName2  –  Grade

I need a query where there is a mutual relation / existence.

What I mean is that the returned result from the query will only include the users where on the same row there is both UserName1 and UserName2 mutually (see image below for a better example / explanation).

Any user can work with any other user.

So the result will be (the order doesn’t matter) ideally in one line:

John – 5000  —  Mary – 3000

or

Mary – 3000  —  John – 5000

The punchline is, it’s one dynamically changing table with active Users using the F.Key to the main User’s table, which has the P.Key.

Please see image below for a better example / explanation.

Database is SQL 2005.

Many thanx in advance

* Edit: Screenshot that hopefully help explain it all.

The end result should be 2 rows, because only they have a mutual relation in TblDynamicUserList:

ana – Phone – 3000   —   RanAbraGmail – Wifi – 2000

and

anaHeb – Phone – 5000   —   RoyP – Phone – 4000


http://www.marketing2go.co.il/SqlQuestion.jpg

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T00:01:51+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 12:01 am

    Would something like this work for you:

    With ManagerWorkers As
        (
        -- get managers with workers
        Select Managers.WorkerUsername As ManagerUsername, Workers.WorkerUsername
        From tblMyTable As Managers
            Join tblMyTable As Workers
                On Workers.ManagerUsername = Managers.WorkerUsername
        ) 
    Select *
    From ManagerWorkers
    Union All
    -- get workers that have a manager in the above list
    Select WorkerUsername, ManagerUsername
    From tblMyTable
    Where Exists(   Select 1
                    From ManagerWorkers
                    Where ManagerWorkers.ManagerUsername = tblMyTable.ManagerUsername
                    )   
    

    EDIT: Given the update to the question how about the following query:

    Select D1.u_username, U1.Permission, U1.Grade, D1.f_username, U2.Permission, U2.Grade
    from tblDynamicUserList As D1
        Join tblDynamicUserList As D2
            On D2.u_username = D1.f_username
                And D2.f_username = D1.u_username
        Join tblUsers As U1
            On U1.u_username = D1.u_username
        Join tblUsers As U2
            On U2.u_username = D2.u_username
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have tried using the obvious method as outlined in the following example but
Anybody tried here using Getting Real(37Signals) approach to develop windows application? (C#/.NET). Or simply
I tried using the Microsoft ReportingControls but found them overly cumbersome, with too little
I tried using "cap rollback" but I get the following error: $ cap rollback
I've tried using source control for a couple projects but still don't really understand
Have you tried using MVC or any other UI pattern for GWT client code.
Have you tried using straight javascript (rather straight ECMAscript 3 standard) in Flex applications,
I have a program that monitors debug messages and I have tried using a
I just got Java5 project that has this error, i tried using Java5 and
I was using Codeplex and tried connecting to their source control using Team Explorer,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.