Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 572427
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T13:36:43+00:00 2026-05-13T13:36:43+00:00

I turned back to C++ after a long time in C#, PHP and other

  • 0

I turned back to C++ after a long time in C#, PHP and other stuff and I found something strange:

temp.name = new char[strlen(name) + strlen(r.name) + 1];

this compiles

temp.name = (char *)malloc(sizeof(char[strlen(name) 
     + strlen(r.name) + 1]));

this doesn’t (temp.name is a char *)

The compiler error is

error C2540: non-constant expression
as array bound

Does anyone know what the problem might be and how it might be remedied? Thank you.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T13:36:43+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 1:36 pm

    sizeof(...) expects a constant compile-time expression. strlen is not a compile-time expression, it is a function which needs to be executed to get a result. Therefore, the compiler is not able to reserve sufficient storage for an array declared like this:

    char c[strlen("Hello")];
    

    Although the length of the string is clearly 5, the compiler does not know.

    To avoid this pitfall, do not use sizeof here. Instead:

    char* c = (char*)malloc(strlen(name)+strlen(rname)+1);
    

    This gives you a pointer to n bytes in return. sizeof(char)==1 is always true, so the number of bytes in the buffer equals the number of chars you can store in it. To malloc arrays of a different type, multiply with the static size of one array element:

    int* c = (int*) malloc(sizeof(int)*100);
    

    This is Ok, because sizeof is applied to a compile-time expression. Of course, the C++ way is much cleaner:

    int* c = new int[100];
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 309k
  • Answers 309k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I'll put everything together into one answer: You could do… May 13, 2026 at 9:54 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Hmmm, interesting problem. I think you could use a little… May 13, 2026 at 9:54 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer you can use ... ALTER TABLE whatever_table NOCHECK CONSTRAINT ALL… May 13, 2026 at 9:54 pm

Related Questions

Background: Here at the office my group uses a common linux environment where we
after some years in Java and C# now I'm back to C++. Of course
I've got a very simplistic game set up on the iPhone. Things move around,
I am trying to debug C++ code using Eclipse Galileo on my MacBook Pro
So I am trying to learn SDL and creating a small game. When the

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.