Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 870865
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T10:32:55+00:00 2026-05-15T10:32:55+00:00

I understand how editing rows can cause concurrency issues, but concurrency issues being caused

  • 0

I understand how editing rows can cause concurrency issues, but concurrency issues being caused by selecting rows is something I do not understand.

If a query selects data from a database, how can a concurrency issue arise? Is it if there is a change made to the data I’m selecting, things will blow up?

In any case, if there is a concurrency issue caused by a select query, what is the best way to handle it? This is what I have in mind, but I wouldn’t be surprised at all if it were wrong.

try
{
    var SelectQuery = 
    from a DB.Table
    where a.Value == 1
    select new {Result = a};
}
catch 
{
    //retry query??
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T10:32:56+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 10:32 am

    In this case your select operation essentially amounts to a read / query. Even read only operations can cause concurrency issues in an application.

    The simplest example is when the object being read from has thread affinity and the read occurs from a different thread. This can cause a race since the data is being accessed in an improper way.

    The best way to handle a concurrency issue is to simply avoid it. If you have 2 threads playing with the same peice of data using a lock to serialize access to the data is probably the best approach. Although a definitive solution requires a bit more detail.

    Can you explain what is happening here and why the race is occurring? Do other threads modify this object while you are reading it?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.