I understand that HTML emails need to use really old school layouts – as per lots of other answers on SO (e.g. HTML email: tables or divs?, HTML Email using CSS).
However, there seems to be some debate over whether it’s still a good idea to use spacer gifs in email.
For example, compare these three layouts:
DIMENSIONS:
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100">
<tr>
<td width="100" height="10"></td>
</tr>
</table>
WITH SPACER GIF:
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0">
<tr>
<td><img src="spacer.gif" width="100" height="10"></td>
</tr>
</table>
WITH SPACER GIF AND DIMENSIONS:
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100">
<tr>
<td width="100" height="10"><img src="spacer.gif" width="100" height="10"></td>
</tr>
</table>
How do I use them with dimensions? Are there any email clients that still require spacer gifs? Is there any harm done either way?
Personally, I never use spacer gifs, because they destroy the layout when image blocking is turned off, for three reasons:
To get around issue #2, you can save each image with its actual dimensions. However, this obviously increases:
and it doesn’t solve issues #1 and #3.
The reason for using spacer gifs is because some clients (Outlook 2007, Outlook 2010, Lotus Notes, Hotmail / Live Mail) will not render an empty cell. It’s very difficult to have absolute precision over dimensions of a text node, and so a spacer image suffices. However, even those clients mentioned will render an empty cell that has width defined.
So as long as you’re defining pixel widths on any empty cells you are fine. To go back to the examples in the question:
Because of this, you should use dimensions and not spacer gifs.
Various articles talk about this question as well (search for ‘spacer images’ on the pages)