Home/ Questions/Q 7957757
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-06-04T04:18:20+00:00

I understand that I should not optimize every single point of my program, let’s

  • 0

I understand that I should not optimize every single point of my program, let’s just assume that I have to optimize array initialization.

So I wrote program that compares for loop versus Array.Clear

using System;
using System.Diagnostics;

namespace TestArraysClear
{
    class Program
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            int[] a = new int[100000];
            Stopwatch sw = Stopwatch.StartNew();
            for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
            {
                sw.Reset(); 
                sw.Start();
                for (int j = 0; j < a.Length; j++)
                {
                    a[j] = 0;
                }
                sw.Stop();
                Console.WriteLine("for " + sw.ElapsedTicks);
                sw.Reset();
                sw.Start();
                Array.Clear(a, 0, a.Length);
                sw.Stop();
                Console.WriteLine("Array.Clear " + sw.ElapsedTicks);
            }
        }
    }
}

Output on my machine:

for 1166
Array.Clear 80
for 1136
Array.Clear 91
for 1350
Array.Clear 71
for 1028
Array.Clear 72
for 962
Array.Clear 54
for 1185
Array.Clear 46
for 962
Array.Clear 55
for 1091
Array.Clear 55
for 988
Array.Clear 54
for 1046
Array.Clear 55

So Array.Clear is about 20 times faster than for loop. But Array.Clear initializes to 0. Can I initialize array to -1 with the same perfomance somehow?

upd: I’m not looking for some “extreme unsafe” code. I’m looking for something as easy as Array.Clear. I just wonder that .NET offers fast 0 initialization, but .NET doesn’t offer initialization to other values. So why .NET like “0” much more than “-1”?

upd I want to reset existent array. So i’m looking for analog of Array.Clear which will reset array to -1, not 0

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    There’s probably a way to do it via unmanaged arrays (pointers) to set the contiguous block of memory to the same value (e.g. whatever the int ‘-1’ is when mapped into its 4-bytes of memory).

    This article here discusses a faster method than with a managed for loop (example given is a byte[] array):
    http://techmikael.blogspot.com/2009/12/filling-array-with-default-value.html

    Also, here:
    What is the equivalent of memset in C#?

    As other posters have mentioned, it seems a bit extreme to do this though, and normally the speed required to initialise the array using a for loop would not be a problem.

    • 0