Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8702059
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T02:33:21+00:00 2026-06-13T02:33:21+00:00

I understand that @synchronized(self) { /* lock is effective inside here only */ }

  • 0

I understand that

 @synchronized(self) { /* lock is effective inside here only */ } 

can keep multiple threads from accessing your method at the same time. So no one will be able to access what’s inside the @synchronized{} while it is being used.

I there someway that I will allow only a limited number of threads, for example allow only 2 threads or 3 threads to access the method at the same time.

PS: I have a method which send synchronous Request, and I want to limit sending synchronous request at maximum of 3 at a time

   @synchronized(self) { 
  webData  = [NSURLConnection sendSynchronousRequest: request returningResponse: &response  error: &error]; 
   }
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T02:33:23+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 2:33 am

    Using an NSOperationQueue (as Bob Kinney suggests) is a good idea. If for some reason you don’t like it, you can use a GCD semaphore.

    E.g.

    @implementation MyObject {
        dispatch_semaphore_t semaphore_;
    }
    
    - (id)init {
        if ((self = [super init])) {
            semaphore_ = dispatch_semaphore_create(3);
        }
    }
    
    - (void)dealloc {
        dispatch_release(semaphore_);
    }
    
    - (void)doTheThing {
        dispatch_semaphore_wait(semaphore_, DISPATCH_TIME_FOREVER); {
            // Do expensive operation here.  At most 3 threads can do it at once.
        } dispatch_semaphore_signal(semaphore_);
    }
    

    Read about “Using Dispatch Semaphores to Regulate the Use of Finite Resources” in the Concurrency Programming Guide for more.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I understand that the synchronized keyword is used to prevent multiple threads from accessing
I understand that we can set the various style attributes from code behind using
I understand that collections like the Hashtable are synchronized, but can someone explain to
I understand that applications under the same domain name can talk to each other
I understand that storage history is something that is better to keep for vcs
Just wanted to check to make sure that I understand this. A synchronized method
I'm trying to understand synchronization of multiple threads in Java more fully. I understand
I understand that: '\n' // literally the backslash character followed by the character for
I understand that JVM and CLR were designed as stack-based virtual machines. When JIT
I understand that the em measurement is a relative unit for font-size, relative to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.