Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 741585
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T08:38:58+00:00 2026-05-14T08:38:58+00:00

I understand that the jvm is itself an application that turns the bytecode of

  • 0

I understand that the jvm is itself an application that turns the bytecode of the java executable into native machine code, but when using native threads I have some questions that I just cannot seem to answer.

  • Does every thread create their own
    instance of the jvm to handle their
    particular execution?
  • If not then does the jvm have to have some way to schedule which thread it will handle next, if so wouldn’t this render the multi-threaded nature of java useless since only one thread can be ran at a time?
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T08:38:58+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 8:38 am

    Does every thread create their own instance of the JVM to handle their particular execution?

    No. They execute in the same JVM so that (for example) they can share objects and values of static fields.


    If not then does the JVM have to have some way to schedule which thread it will handle next

    There are two kinds of thread implementation in Java. Native threads are mapped onto a thread abstraction which is implemented by the host OS. The OS takes care of native thread scheduling, and time slicing.

    The second kind of thread is "green threads". These are implemented and managed by the JVM itself, with the JVM implementing thread scheduling. Java green thread implementations have not been supported by Sun / Oracle JVMs since Java 1.2. (See Green Threads vs Non Green Threads)


    If so wouldn’t this render the multi-threaded nature of Java useless since only one thread can be ran at a time?

    We are talking about green threads now, and this is of historic interest (only) from the Java perspective.

    • Green threads have the advantage that scheduling and context switching are faster in the non-I/O case. (Based on measurements made with Java on Linux 2.2; http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.8.9238)

    • With pure green threads, N programming language threads are mapped to a single native thread. In this model you don’t get true parallel execution, as you noted.

    • In a hybrid thread implementation, N programming language threads are mapped onto M native threads (where N > M). In this model, the in-process thread scheduler is responsible for the green thread to native thread scheduling AND you get true parallel execution (if M > 1); see https://stackoverflow.com/a/16965741/139985.

    But even with the pure green threads, you still get concurrency. Control is switched to another threads a thread blocks on an I/O operation, whick acquiring a lock, and so on. Furthermore, the JVM’s runtime could implement periodic thread preemption so that a CPU intensive thread doesn’t monopolize the (single) core to the exclusion of other threads

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I understand that they are both supposed to be small, but what are the
I understand that requests are served by different threads, but do they all come
I understand that creating too many threads in an application isn't being what you
I understand that some countries have laws regarding website accessibility. In general, what are
I understand that there are several ways to blend XNA and WPF within the
I understand that Microsoft uses this template when versioning their products: Major.Minor.Build.Revision. Major is
I understand that server-side validation is an absolute must to prevent malicious users (or
I understand that IronPython is an implementation of Python on the .NET platform just
I understand that an id must be unique within an HTML/XHTML page. For a
I understand that these methods are for pickling/unpickling and have no relation to the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.