Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7519379
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T01:53:35+00:00 2026-05-30T01:53:35+00:00

I understand that t:saveState allows a request scope bean to persist for longer than

  • 0

I understand that t:saveState allows a request scope bean to persist for longer than request scope allows but shorter than session scope bean. You are also able to use t:saveState on an entire bean.

so my question is if you use t:saveState on an entire bean what are the advantage of using t:saveState over having the Bean configured in session Scope?

Also under what conditions do you make the bean request scope and use T:saveState instead of making the bean Session Scope to being with?

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T01:53:36+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 1:53 am

    The bean which is referenced by <t:saveState> will live as long as the view lives. It does basically the same as the new JSF 2.0 view scope does.

    This is particularly useful when you’re dealing with data which should live as long as you’re interacting with the same view by returning null or void on action methods. If you would have used the session scope, then multiple views (multiple browser windows/tabs within the same session) would all share the same data. This may have undesireable side effects when the enduser interacts with the page in multiple browser tabs/windows and switches between them. All changes done in one tab would be reflected in the other tab.

    The session scope should absolutely only be used for real session scoped data, such as the logged-in user, its preferences, language, etcetera which can safely be shared between multiple browser windows/tabs within the same session.

    See also:

    • How to choose the right bean scope?
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I understand that they are both supposed to be small, but what are the
I understand that requests are served by different threads, but do they all come
I understand that SimpleXML is far more efficient than DOMDocument. Any advice on how
I understand that the CLR needs to do marshaling in some cases, but let's
I understand that 0MQ is supposed to be faster than TCP Sockets in a
I understand that PHP stores a user's session id in a cookie called PHPSESSID
I understand that git diff compares a staged file and modified but not staged
Understand that 1x1 widget size should be 72 dip x 72 dip, but this
I understand that @synthesize window; combined with @property 'auto-creates' your setters and getters, but
I understand that Internet Explorer is poor at supporting CSS3 - but is there

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.