Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3212468
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T14:50:29+00:00 2026-05-17T14:50:29+00:00

I understand the behavior of const -qualified data types. I am curious, though, if

  • 0

I understand the behavior of const-qualified data types. I am curious, though, if there is any performance gain or loss from over- or under-zealousness of qualifying variables as const. I am thinking particularly of variables declared and used exclusively within an isolated code block. For example, something like:

const qreal padding = CalculatePadding();
const QSizeF page_size = CalculatePagePreviewSize(padding);
const QRectF content_rect = CalculatePagePreviewContentRect(page_size);
const QList<QRectF> pages = renderer.BuildPrintPages(printer_, map_scene_);
const QFont page_number_font = CalculatePageNumberFont();
const QFontMetrics metrics(page_number_font);

Suppose I only need const-qualified methods on all of these (and more.) Is there any performance gain in declaring them all const? Or, conversely, does this actually hurt performance?

I am curious for both run-time performance (I am guessing this makes no difference as the const is exclusively a compile-time check–can someone confirm?) and compile-time performance. I do not have enough experience with c++ to have a feel for this, and am wondering if I should err on the side of over- or under-applying const when all other things (maintainability, etc.) are equal.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T14:50:30+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 2:50 pm

    const is mainly a compile-time thing, however, declaring something as const sometimes allows for certain optimizations. If the code in question isn’t a performance bottleneck, I wouldn’t worry about it and just use const as intended: to produce clearer code and prevent yourself from doing stupid things.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm trying to understand the behavior of Scala for-loop implicit box/unboxing of numerical types.
I have to believe there's a way to clear image data from memory once
I don't understand behavior of glassfish v3.1.2. I run my java web-application with such
I don't understand this behavior in javascript for inheritance I've always seen it defined
I am struggling really hard to understand this behavior so maybe someone can shed
I'm trying to understand an estrange behavior in Python. I have the next python
I am unable to understand the weird behavior of this program. I have 2
I'd like to understand the reason for this behavior of OCAML objects. Suppose I
I'm trying to understand exact C++ (pre C++0x) behavior with regards to references and
I have a C# application that needs to get variable-length data passed back from

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.