Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3353394
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T02:08:45+00:00 2026-05-18T02:08:45+00:00

I understand this question may be quickly flagged as a duplicate of many other

  • 0

I understand this question may be quickly flagged as a duplicate of many other more popular questions, but I’ll still ask it:

I need a container that provides duplicate checking on insert (like std::set, but allows me to modify elements already present (like std::vector). It should also be relatively fast to search for elements (which would prefer std::set again). Would it be better to use a vector and perhaps a custom duplicate-checking insert_iterator instead of modifying set elements by erasing and reinserting them?

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T02:08:46+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 2:08 am

    What is to stop you from using a std::set? If you need to modify an element, copy it, erase it, then re-insert.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

So I understand this may come across as a open question, but I need
This question has been asked before but i still don't understand it fully so
This question may sound silly.. but my intention is to understand advantages of Java
This question may be redundant, but i could not totally understand how to do
I understand that this question may seem somewhat ungrounded, but if someone knows anything
This question may be usual for many, i tried for an hour to understand
I understand that this question may get closed for being duplicate (sorry if it
I understand this question may sound very basic but I have been trying to
I understand that this question may be subjective, this is why I need an
I understand this is an easy question but for some reason this just isn't

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.