Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6926685
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T10:57:03+00:00 2026-05-27T10:57:03+00:00

I understand what public, private, and protected do. I know that you are supposed

  • 0

I understand what public, private, and protected do. I know that you are supposed to use them to comply with the concept of Object Oriented Programming, and I know how to implement them in a program using multiple classes.

My question is: Why do we do this? Why shouldn’t I have one class modifying the global variables of another class directly? And even if you shouldn’t why are the protected, private, and public modifiers even necessary? It’s as if programmers don’t trust themselves not to do it, even though they are the ones writing the program.

Thanks in advance.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T10:57:03+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 10:57 am

    You’re right, it’s because we can’t trust ourselves. Mutable state is a major factor in complexity of computer programs, it’s too easy to build something that seems ok at first and later grows out of control as the system gets bigger. Restricting access helps to reduce the opportunities for objects’ states to change in unpredictable ways. The idea is for objects to communicate with each other through well-defined channels, as opposed to tweaking each others’ data directly. That way we have some hope of testing the individual objects and having some confidence in how they’ll behave as part of a larger system.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I understand what public/protected/private accessors mean in Java or PHP for instance. However, when
Why isn't HashAlgorithm.Dispose public? void IDisposable.Dispose() { this.Dispose(true); GC.SuppressFinalize(this); } I understand that it
After reading a question on @private I understand how that works. However, since all
Method visibility in Ruby (public, protected, and private methods) has been well explained in
From whatever little I understand by reading various material, public-private key pair are the
I don't understand what I'm doing wrong here: public void Draw(GameTime gameTime) // in
I understand how XMLSerializer could work by using reflection to figure out what public
How do I convert public key generated by OpenSSL into one NSS would understand?
I was just trying to understand delegates using the following code. public class delegatesEx
Why does this not work? Do I not understand delegate covariance correctly? public delegate

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.