Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1028309
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T12:22:02+00:00 2026-05-16T12:22:02+00:00

I use a tcp socket in the following way: m_socket = new Socket(AddressFamily.InterNetwork, SocketType.Stream,

  • 0

I use a tcp socket in the following way:

m_socket = new Socket(AddressFamily.InterNetwork, SocketType.Stream, ProtocolType.Tcp);
m_socket.ReceiveTimeout = 15;

The general flow is that I run the m_socket.Receive in an infinite while loop and at some point the socket becomes empty for a long period but I don’t want to close it.
Instead I want to keep trying to read and timeout with exception every 15 seconds.

What happens is that in the first time the socket becomes empty I get a timeout socket exception after 15 seconds as expected.
Then, because I’m still in the loop, m_socket.Receive is called again – however this time a non-blocking socket operation could not be completed exception is thrown (which is not what I expect, it supposes to block for another 15 seconds) even though when I query m_socket.Blocking one line above, it says TRUE.

The interesting thing is that if I perform m_socket.Blocking = true; just before m_socket.Receive, everything runs as expected (only timeout exceptions are thrown every 15 seconds).

The only possible explanation is that the timeout exception somehow changed the Receive operation or the Socket operations in general to work in a non-blocking way while not changing the “Blocking” property accordingly.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T12:22:03+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 12:22 pm

    I’ve found this

    Apparently, there’s a bug regarding this issue that was fixed in .NET 4.0

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.