Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6389669
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T03:25:58+00:00 2026-05-25T03:25:58+00:00

I use legacy library and need use cast Object to Collection. For avoid exceptions

  • 0

I use legacy library and need use cast Object to Collection.
For avoid exceptions I think to use instanceof.
So questions two:
1. If I use instanceof – need use try.. catch cast exception to avoid exceptions?
2. Does it hits performance?
Thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T03:25:59+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 3:25 am
    1. If you use instanceOf then you do not need try-catch(ClasscastException e). instanceOf is guaranteed to work, even with nulls.

    2. In today’s VMs, casting does not show any measurable performance hit. Rather if you find doing casting too often, then revisit your design.

    NOTE: instanceof does not work with Generics due to type erasure.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I need to use java-legacy code with the following method: public void doit(Map <String,
We need to use a legacy mysql db in a rails app. I already
I need to use some legacy classes in Hibernate. One of the classes doesn't
I'd like to use Doxygen to document legacy code that's a mix of C
I'm updating some of our legacy C++ code to use the MFC feature pack
I'm wondering what strategies people use for reduced sign on with legacy applications and
I am developing an application that needs to use regini (because of legacy reasons)
i need to develop a .net library which exposes a java web service proxy
We recently ported over legacy code to now use Visual Studio 2005 and unicode.
To support legacy URLs in my application, I use a regex to convert URLs

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.