Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7842837
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 2, 20262026-06-02T16:24:52+00:00 2026-06-02T16:24:52+00:00

I use logistic regression with scipy.optimize.fmin_bfgs for minimizing the cost function. The cost function

  • 0

I use logistic regression with scipy.optimize.fmin_bfgs for minimizing the cost function. The cost function stays constant for my particular data set and BFGS does not converge, so I want to apply lasso+ridge regularization.

Now, I want to try out optimizing the cost for various values of the regularization parameters lambda1/2 in order to find the best combination:

for lambda1 in range(...):
    for lambda2 in range(..):
        scipy.optimize.fmin_bfgs(...) # Optimize cost with lambda1 and lambda2

The problem is that, because BFGS is not converging, it stays “forever” in the call for the first values of lambda1/2.

Is there a way to automatically stop fmin_bfgs after a while? The maxiter parameter does not help me, because I have 1000s of samples and a large number of features/sample, so it doesn’t even finish one such iteration in acceptable time.

In scipy 0.11, fmin_bfgs has a maxfun parameter — can one emulate this somehow in scipy 0.10?

EDIT: By popular demand, here are some relevant snippets of code:

The function computing the cost (the usual notations apply):

def computeCost(theta, X, y):
    h = sigmoid(X.dot(theta.T))
    J = y.T.dot(log(h)) + (1.0 - y.T).dot(log(1.0 - h))
    J_reg2 = theta[1:]**2
    J_reg1 = theta[1:]
    cost = (-1.0 / m) * (J.sum() + LAMBDA2 * J_reg2.sum() + LAMBDA1 * J_reg1.sum())
    return cost

Invoking the fmin_bfgs function:

initial_thetas = numpy.zeros((len(train_X[0]), 1))
myargs = (train_X, train_y)
theta = scipy.optimize.fmin_bfgs(computeCost, x0=initial_thetas, args=myargs)
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-02T16:24:52+00:00Added an answer on June 2, 2026 at 4:24 pm

    Your problem isn’t the number of iterations. The reason why the lambda numbers aren’t changing is that the optimisation isn’t working.
    Scipy should be working out those numbers for you rather than you supplying them through for loops.

    Maybe if you could include more code it would be easier to see how to fix it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am attempting to run a pooled logistic regression with panel data and a
use Service layer to persist data into database. But the Unit Test does not
USE master GO DECLARE @DbName nvarchar(MAX) SET @DbName = N'DataBase' ALTER DATABASE @DbName SET
I would like to plot the shifted logistic function as shown from Wolfram Alpha
Currently I am working on a project that would use genetic algorithms to optimize
Use case: user clicks the link on a webpage - boom! load of files
use LWP::Simple; use Parallel::ForkManager; @links=( [http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/sweethome3d/SweetHome3D-2.1-windows.exe,SweetHome3D-2.1-windows.exe], [http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/sweethome3d/SweetHome3D-2.1-macosx.dmg,SweetHome3D-2.1-macosx.dmg], [http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/sweethome3d/SweetHome3DViewer-2.1.zip,SweetHome3DViewer-2.1.zip], ); # Max 30 processes for
use this website a lot but first time posting. My program creates a number
Use case: I've just entered insert mode, and typed some text. Now I want
use Rack::Static, :urls => ['/stylesheets', '/images'], :root => 'public' run proc { |env| [200,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.