Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7637471
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T07:56:54+00:00 2026-05-31T07:56:54+00:00

I use SQL Server. I got a large table – millions of rows. And

  • 0

I use SQL Server. I got a large table – millions of rows. And I iterate through them (SELECT .. WHERE ..). This is a long operation (and I assume can’t be shorter).

So what am I asking is if there will be any problems to insert data into that table in the progress of selecting? If yes, what should I do to reduce that? Same questing for update command (with indexed parameters of course).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T07:56:55+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 7:56 am

    The answer is yes, absolutely. A simple solution (if it’s an acceptable trade off within your application) is to specify the NOLOCK locking hint. IE:

    select * from table with NOLOCK

    The tradeoff is that you won’t get a consistent read, but in many cases this isn’t problem.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've got a simple query running against SQL Server 2005 SELECT * FROM Table
I got a multi-use SQL table in my SQL Server 2008 database. It can
I use SQL Server 2005. I have a simple logging table that my web
I use SQL Server 2008 and have a table with 5 char typed columns.
I currently use SQL Server to store products in a large catalog web site.
I've got a nullable column in SQL Server 2008 that I use to store
I've got an SQL Server database, which has a table containing a number of
I have got hold of a sql server 2008 developer edition and this is
I am working with SQL Server 2005. I need to select all rows from
I have got SQL Server database in which Table column name have spaces. For

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.