Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8277341
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 8, 20262026-06-08T08:39:58+00:00 2026-06-08T08:39:58+00:00

I use the Jahmm library for classification of accelerometer sequences. I have created my

  • 0

I use the Jahmm library for classification of accelerometer sequences.

I have created my models but when i try to calculate the proibablity of a test sequence on a model by:

ForwardBackwardScaledCalculator fbsc = new ForwardBackwardScaledCalculator(test_pair.getValue(),model_pair.getValue().get_hmm());
                System.out.println(fbsc.lnProbability());

I get negative values like -1278.0926336276573.

The comment in the code of the library states that the lnProbability method:

Return the napierian logarithm of the probability of the sequence that
generated this object.

Returns: The probability of the sequence of interest’s napierian
logarithm

But how to compare two of such logarithms? I call the method on two different models with the two test sequences so i get 4 probabilities:

The test sequence: fast_test.seq on fast_model yields a Napierian log from -1278.0926336276573
The test sequence: fast_test.seq on slow_model yields a Napierian log from -1862.6947488370433
The test sequence: slow_test.seq on fast_model yields a Napierian log from -4433.949818774553
The test sequence: slow_test.seq on slow_model yields a Napierian log from -4208.071445499895

But in this context, does it mean that the closer we get to zero, the more similar the test sequence is to the model (so in this example the classification accuracy = 100%?)

Thank you

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-08T08:39:59+00:00Added an answer on June 8, 2026 at 8:39 am

    If by “Napierian logarithm“, the natural logarithm is meant, then you can get a probability from a return value x by raising e to the x, e.g. using Math.exp. However, the reason that logarithms are returned is because the probability values are too small to represent in a double; Math.exp(-1278.0926336276573) will simply return zero. See the Wikipedia article about log probabilities.

    does it mean that the closer we get to zero, the more similar the test sequence is to the model

    exp(0) == 1 and log(1) == 0, and indeed the lower the probability, the smaller (more negative) its logarithm. So, the closer you get to zero, the more probable the sentence is under the model.

    However, this need not directly relate to “similarity to a model”, let alone “classification accuracy”, since HMMs (being generative models) will ascribe lower probability to longer sequences. Read up on HMMs in your favorite textbook; a full explanation would be too long for this answer box and is a math question, so off-topic for this website.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Use case: we have some project meta-data files which we want tracked, but are
Use Elixir and have two entities -- Voter and Candidate -- with many to
use javascript or other method ? have any recommendation?
use warnings; use Test::More; use File::Find::Rule; use Test::File::Find::Rule; my $rule = File::Find::Rule->file->name('*.pl')->not_grep(qr/^\s*use\s+strict;/m, sub {
Use case: You have 2-3 files displayed in your MacVim window(s). You press ctrl+Q
Use scenario is pretty simple: I have a desktop only application that could be
Use case is to have a server connect to thousands of users email accounts
use case example I have a servlet that is receiving login requests. If a
Use to work with a MySQL + + (library for C + +) The
use PHP and MySQL. Want my website to have the feature of image uploading

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.