Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5840691
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T11:47:06+00:00 2026-05-22T11:47:06+00:00

I use the JAXBContext.newInstance operation in my JBoss based web application. This operation, as

  • 0

I use the JAXBContext.newInstance operation in my JBoss based web application. This operation, as I understand, is very heavyweight. I only require two unique instances of the Marshaller class.

My initial proposal is to have a static initializer block that will initialize these two instances only once upon the class loading:

public class MyWebApp {
    private static Marshaller requestMarshaller;
    private static Marshaller responseMarshaller;

    static {
        try {
            // one time instance creation
            requestMarshaller = JAXBContext.newInstance(Request.class).createMarshaller();
            responseMarshaller = JAXBContext.newInstance(Response.class).createMarshaller();
        } catch (JAXBException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
    }

    private void doSomething() {
            requestMarshaller.marshall(...);
            responseMarshaller.marshall(...);
            ...
    }

}

If this is a reasonable solution then I guess I’ll have answered my own question, but I would like to know if this is the correct way to do this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T11:47:07+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 11:47 am

    A JAXB implementation (Metro, EclipseLink MOXy, Apache JaxMe, etc) typically initializes its metadata during the JAXBContext.newInstance call. All OXM tools need to initialize mapping metadata at some point and try to minimize the cost of this operation. Since it is impossible to do it with zero cost, it is best to only do it once. Instances of JAXBContext are thread safe, so yes you only need to create it once.

    From the JAXB 2.2 Specification, Section 4.2 JAXB Context:

    To avoid the overhead involved in
    creating a JAXBContext instance, a
    JAXB application is encouraged to
    reuse a JAXBContext instance. An
    implementation of abstract class
    JAXBContext is required to be
    thread-safe, thus, multiple threads in
    an application can share the same
    JAXBContext instance.

    Instances of Marshaller and Unmarshaller are not thread safe and must not be shared among threads, they are lightweight to create.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Use case: 3rd party application wants to programatically monitor a text file being generated
I want to use a temp directory that will be unique to this build.
I make a distributed embedded application that will make use of several micro-controllers. The
'''use Jython''' import shutil print dir(shutil) There is no, shutil.move, how does one move
Use case: A does something on his box and gots stuck. He asks B
We use a data acquisition card to take readings from a device that increases
I use Firebug and the Mozilla JS console heavily, but every now and then
I use rsync to synchronize files to Windows clients in a server agnostic way.
I use emacs to edit my xml files (nxml-mode) and the files were generated
I use the VS2008 command prompt for builds, TFS access etc. and the cygwin

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.