I used a Java method called ‘containsAll()’ to check if ArrayLists have common content.
Let’s say I have a list A (one row), and several other lists in a MySQL table (in column ‘name’, row by row).
All lists consist of comma-separated Strings (at least one String in a list) – names or whatever.
Now, I want to check if all Strings in list A can be found in any of the rows in column ‘name’.
The result set should show all the rows in ‘name’ that match, that includes rows/lists must have all Strings in list A, and can have additional Strings.
Example I
A: ‘Mr.T’
____name_________________________________________
'Hannibal'
'Hannibal','Face','Murdock','Mr.T','Donald Duck'
'Face','Donald Duck'
'Superman','Chuck Norris','Mr.T'
_________________________________________________
Result set: ‘Hannibal’,’Face’,’Murdock’,’Mr.T’,’Donald Duck’ -AND-
‘Superman’,Chuck Norris’,’Mr.T’
Example II
A: ‘Rocky’, ‘Mr.T’, ‘Apollo’
______name__________________________________________________
'Hannibal','Face','Murdock','Donald Duck','Superman','Mr.T'
'Rocky','Apollo','Ivan'
'Apollo', 'Superman','Hannibal','Rocky','Mr.T','Chuck Norris'
'Rocky','Mr.T','Apollo','Chuck Norris'
_____________________________________________________________
Result set: ‘Apollo’, ‘Superman’,’Hannibal’,’Rocky’,’Mr.T’,’Chuck Norris’ -AND-
‘Rocky’,’Mr.T’,’Apollo’,’Cuck Norris’
I wonder if one can carry out those results using a MySQL query.
Thank you in advance.
It appears you want to do an array intersection, except your array is a single column. It can be done, but it will be slow, difficult to debug and will not leverage the power of relational databases. A better way would be to change your table schema to something like this:
Table groups
Table members_in_group
Then you can query like this:
The
groupstable is probably very like your current table. Themembers_in_groupstable is the same data chopped up into easily searchable parts.ETA given your comment, this should work if you can guarantee that each
character_listcontains only one instance of each character:In this case the
HAVINGclause must equal 3 because there are 3 members inIN ('Mr. T', 'Apollo', 'Rocky').