Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7367813
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 29, 20262026-05-29T03:35:06+00:00 2026-05-29T03:35:06+00:00

I used a literal as a dictionary, but a third party binding tool only

  • 0

I used a literal as a dictionary, but a third party binding tool only takes arrays.

This is one way, is there a better one?

var arr = [];
$.each(objectLiteral, function () { arr.push(this); });
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-29T03:35:06+00:00Added an answer on May 29, 2026 at 3:35 am

    I think there is nothing wrong with your solution.

    This is a shorter one:

    var arr = $.map(objectLiteral, function (value) { return value; });
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm still getting used to the way ASP.net WebForms handles things but this one
Is there any way that I can change how a Literal of a code
I understand that the @ symbol can be used before a string literal to
used to be able to do this without any problems: for (data in dataArray)
Is there a canonical function/method for escaping a string to be used in a
This is a pretty odd situation I have here. I have used a piece
I've a user control which contains asp:Literal. <div> <asp:Literal id=MenuContainer runat=server /> </div> There
I wonder why there doesn't exist a literal for partial function types. I have
What Literal control is used for in asp.net? and What is the difference between
I'm used to passing around string like this in my C++ applications: void foo(const

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.