Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6788049
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T17:26:18+00:00 2026-05-26T17:26:18+00:00

I used FireFox throughout all this time and didn’t see that. But when I

  • 0

I used FireFox throughout all this time and didn’t see that. But when I opened IE9 I saw that the GET request was not as I intended:

$.get("includes/processSub.php", choice, function(response){ 
 $('#subscriptionValueText').html(response);
});

So I have the request body like this:
(IE9 F12):

GET /MySite/includes/processSub.php?type=BRONZE_COST_1 HTTP/1.1

The added HTTP/1.1 is confusing my parser on the other end.
Why is that ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T17:26:18+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 5:26 pm

    jQuery is not adding that, that is a normal part of an HTTP request. If you’ve got a server that doesn’t understand it, that server is broken. You can read RFC 2616 to familiarise yourself with the HTTP protocol.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I used to have a great Firefox add-on for this and I can't remember
I'm writing a Firefox extension that's to be used in house. Basically, I need
t.tBodies(0).appendChild(r); is not working in firefox. This is javascript code and used to create
I used the following line in Firefox's URL field : http://www.baidu.com/s?wd=你 This line was
Last time I used Selenium IDE, I had a previous version of Firefox. Now,
This question is about the Java API of Selenium 2 RC2, used with Firefox
The :-moz-drag-over pseudoclass (in Firefox) is used for styling an element that is a
I tried to search previous discussion about this issue but I didn't find one,
I read somewhere that css masks can be used in Firefox with svg files,
When Chrome or Firefox is used on this page: a page on dell.com (or

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.