I used the EF 5.x DbContext Fluent Generator to generate my POCO classes but my properties are not coded as virtual. Don’t you have to have that for tracking to occur? Why wouldn’t the template already use virtual for properties?
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I used the EF 5.x DbContext Fluent Generator to generate my POCO classes but my properties are not coded as virtual. Don’t you have to have that for tracking to occur? Why wouldn’t the template already use virtual for properties?
Because we found that for the majority of users it was better to use snapshot change tracking rather than change tracking proxies. Change tracking proxies have their place in certain situations, but usually they add complexity without any real benefit. For more info see http://blog.oneunicorn.com/2011/11/24/why-are-the-dbcontext-t4-templates-so-different-from-the-ef4-poco-templates/ and http://blog.oneunicorn.com/2011/12/05/should-you-use-entity-framework-change-tracking-proxies/