Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 431299
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T19:57:39+00:00 2026-05-12T19:57:39+00:00

I used to have a situation where I hit the database a every time

  • 0

I used to have a situation where I hit the database a every time I needed information on an employee. Then I taught myself about data caching and have since cleared up that problem substantially.

Now, I’d like to take it to the next level. I’d like to reduce load times by caching my object instantiation. I’m not sure that I’m being clear, so I’ll explain a little more. I have an employee object that (for example sake) has 50 properties. Some of those properties are generic lists of other related objects (such as a list of network assets belonging to that employee). So, when I instantiate an employee object for employee #30455, I don’t have to hit the database (neccessarily) because that much is cached.

BUT, I do have to run down the property list, filling them with data from datarows from the cached dataset. I also have to populate those generic lists I chose to include at the head end. Seems like I should be able to cache that object so I don’t have to do all of that over again. Thoughts?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T19:57:40+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 7:57 pm

    One thought I have had is to instantiate employee objects using a method instead of a constructor. Then, I can do something like…

    public static Employee getEmployee(int EmployeeId)
        {
            HttpContext context = HttpContext.Current;
            string key = e.ToString() + "_" + EmployeeId;
    
            Employee e = (Employee)context.Session[key];
            if (e == null)
            {
                e = new Employee(EmployeeId);
                context.Session[key] = e;
            }
            return e;
        }
    

    …so that I can just…

    Employee e = Employee.getEmployee(35440);
    

    I’m already doing this in places, but I never felt like it was the best way… seems more correct to always instantiate using a constructor. Is there a better way?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Hypothetical situation: let's say I have a 3rd party .net assembly being used in
I'm writing some Objective-C code and I've frequently hit the situation where I have
I have read that enabling Change Data Capture obviously has an impact on database
We have a situation where Excel's XML 2003 format is widely used for file
I have a situation whereby an application we use has many databases used for
I have used traditional version control systems to maintain source code repositories on past
I have used IPC in Win32 code a while ago - critical sections, events,
I have used the XML Parser before, and even though it worked OK, I
I have used Photoshop CS2's Save for Web feature to create a table of
I have used this in my HTML: <q> Hai How r u </q> Which

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.