Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I usually develop new features of my codes in dedicated branches, then merge them to master.
The problem with this is that after some time I have a lot of obsolete branches that are cluttering the github interface, where there might be instead branches which are actively developed.
Is there a way to archive them somehow, or should I just delete them, as the commits have already been merged?
If you have already merged branches and have no need to develop on them anymore, then it’s safe to delete them. You don’t loose any commit, as they have been merged and are now stored in master.
I would only propose to leave branches you actively develop