Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7739735
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T08:35:46+00:00 2026-06-01T08:35:46+00:00

I usually have to check things like: if [‘Bob’,’Mary’,’John’].include? @user.name Is there a way

  • 0

I usually have to check things like:

if ['Bob','Mary','John'].include? @user.name

Is there a way to write something like:

if @user.name.in? ['Bob','Mary','John']

Thank you.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T08:35:47+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 8:35 am

    Rails 3.1 has got this Object.in? method

    characters = ["Konata", "Kagami", "Tsukasa"]
    "Konata".in?(characters) # => true
    
    character = "Konata"
    character.in?("Konata", "Kagami", "Tsukasa") # => true
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I usually have my structure laid out something like this: <div id=all> <div id=page>
When I run an MSI (without parameters) I usually have to click my way
When performing many inserts into a database I would usually have code like this:
When I look at Java frameworks like Hibernate, JPA, or Spring, I usually have
I have a few things that I cannot find a good way to perform
When creating projects in Hudson, I usually have to check a few CVS repositories
It's a known fact that Windows applications usually have 2Gb of private address space
I work with Mac OS X Leopard. I usually have 5 or 10 text
In a Python system for which I develop, we usually have this module structure.
When I'm testing my simple geometric library, I usually have one or two methods

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.