Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5965301
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T19:35:12+00:00 2026-05-22T19:35:12+00:00

I want a JVM assembler that is straightforward and simple. It should take a

  • 0

I want a JVM assembler that is straightforward and simple. It should take a text file written in the mnemonic language described in The Java Virtual Machine Specification and produce class files, i.e. bytecode.

To be clear: I don’t want a library that can generate class files from invocations of an API.

What are the current statuses of the JVM assemblers? Do they support invokedynamic (not mandatory to me, but an advantage)? On what operative system can I use them? What are their individual pros and cons?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T19:35:13+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 7:35 pm

    Jasmin is the de facto standard. Recent versions support invokedynamic. It’s written in Java, so it’s portable.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have written a Java application that runs from the command line. I want
I want to learn some JVM language, but there are so many EDIT :
I want to see how much memory is allocated to my Java JVM on
I want to write a sample Java file in which I want to know
I want to specify some JVM arguments when calling a jar file like so:
I want to know the location that JVM allocates to objects being placed in
I add this line to /home/{user}/.bashrc file: export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk but when I want to
I should connect to a java program on localhost jvm using JMX. In other
(Related question: Java compilers or JVM languages that support goto? ) I have decompiled
I am learning ClassLoader in Java, then I want to know, why JVM has

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.