Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3212338
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T14:49:41+00:00 2026-05-17T14:49:41+00:00

I want a single generic class that can accept either reference or value types,

  • 0

I want a single generic class that can accept either reference or value types, and only perform an action based on an equality test. consider the following:

public class Property<TProp>
  where TProp : struct, IEquatable<TProp>
{
   public TProp Value;

   public void SetValue(ObservableObject owner, TProp value)
   {
      if (!Value.Equals(value))     // cannot use != on struct constrained TProp
      {
          // ... set the property
      }
   }
}

public class ByRefProperty<TProp>
  where TProp : class   // Dont want to require IEquatable<> on reference type TProp
{
   public TProp Value;

   public void SetValue(ObservableObject owner, TProp value)
   {
      if (Value != value)           
      {
          // ... set the property
      }
   }
}

I’m having to use generic constraints and two classes to be able to test value type equality vs reference type equality. Is there any way around this so that I end up with just one class?

I don’t particularly want a solution that involves boxing value types, using reflection, or run-time IL generation. Is there a simple solution that I’ve missed here?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T14:49:42+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 2:49 pm

    The best way do to this is generally EqualityComparer<T>.Default:

    public void SetValue(ObservableObject owner, TProp value)
    {
       if (!EqualityComparer<TProp>.Default.Equals(Value, value))
       {
           // ... set the property
       }
    }
    

    Note that this even handles null values for you in the logical way (null is equal to null but nothing else).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

So I've run into a case where I have a class that can store
I want to implement a Generic Tree in java and i want to use
I tried my hand at a generic class, and on a second attempt I've
I'm using some code from a book to implement a generic repository class for
let's say i want to have a member variable for a pointer to std::vector
I'm using StructureMap DI/IoC and I've got is a generic InMemory repository. Works great.
I'm playing around on GAE (I'm using Objectify) and wanted to make something like
I am used to making separate Business Object and List<> classes for my DB
I am writing an EF4 datalayer for an MVC 2 web application and I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.