Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 810479
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T00:53:30+00:00 2026-05-15T00:53:30+00:00

I want objects managed by a shared_ptr to be allocated from a pool, say

  • 0

I want objects managed by a shared_ptr to be allocated from a pool, say Boost’s Pool interface, how can this be achieved?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T00:53:31+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 12:53 am

    Here’s the code to do what you want (probably won’t compile as I don’t have boost on hand and I’m writing it from memory):

    class YourClass; // your data type, defined somewhere else
    
    boost::object_pool<YourClass> allocator;
    
    void destroy(YourClass* pointer)
    {
        allocator.destroy(pointer);
    }
    
    boost::shared_ptr<YourClass> create()
    {
        // usage of object_pool<??>::construct requires that you have a 
        // YourClass::YourClass(void) defined. If you need to pass arguments
        // to the new instance, you need to do that separately.
        // 
        // for example using a YourClass::Initialize(your,parameters,here) method
        // before returning from this function
        return boost::shared_ptr<YourClass>( allocator.construct(), &destroy );
    }
    
    // usage:
    boost::shared_ptr<YourClass>  newObject = create();
    

    I implemented this twice, in two different projects. In both, the create and destroy functions were synchronized (you can add a boost::mutex lock around the use of allocator) and they were members of a factory class (and the destroy‘s signature was modified to void (YourClass*) through the usage of boost::bind).

    You can also avoid writing two extra functions (the destroy and create) by binding object_pool<YourClass>::destroy dirrectly in the boost::shared_ptr constructor.

    I’m too lazy to write all that now :).

    Edit (moved my answer comment in here for the code formatting):

    To bind the destroy function:

    class ClassFactory
    {
        boost::object_pool<YourClass> allocator;
    public:
        boost::shared_ptr<YourClass> create()
        {
            return boost::shared_ptr<YourClass>(
                allocator.construct(),
                boost::bind(&ClassFactory::destroy, this, _1) );
        }
    
        void destroy(YourClass* pointer)
        {
            allocator.destroy(pointer);
        }
    };
    

    ClassFactory should have a longer lifetime than the shared_ptr (if the ClassFactory instance is deleted, the this pointer passed to the shared_ptr instance will be invalid – and crash your app when the shared_ptr deletes the YourClass instance).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 420k
  • Answers 420k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I'd probably do this: iterate over lines in the output… May 15, 2026 at 10:48 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You need to handle the <img>'s click event and return… May 15, 2026 at 10:48 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer With ReSharper 5, you can search for structured pattern of… May 15, 2026 at 10:48 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.