Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8835615
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T09:17:58+00:00 2026-06-14T09:17:58+00:00

I want something that’s like unique_ptr, but guaranteed (within reason) to be non-null. I

  • 0

I want something that’s like unique_ptr, but guaranteed (within reason) to be non-null. I wrote this class that contains a unique_ptr, and I wrote this move constructor that I’d hoped would allow me to move-construct one of my pointers from another, as long as the underlying unique_ptr could be similarly move-constructed. So, I first try it with something simple; move-constructing a pointer-to-int from a pointer-to-int.

#include <memory>
#include <utility>
#include <cassert>


template<
    typename T
    > 
class Nonup
{
    private:

        std::unique_ptr<T> m_ptr;

    public:

        explicit Nonup( T* p )
        : m_ptr( p )
        { assert( p ); }

        Nonup( const Nonup& ) = delete;
        Nonup& operator=( const Nonup& ) = delete;

        template<typename U>
        Nonup( Nonup<U>&& old )
        :
            m_ptr( std::move( old ) )
        {}

        Nonup& operator=( Nonup&& rhs ) = default;

        decltype( *m_ptr ) operator*() const { return *m_ptr; }
};


int main()
{
    Nonup<int> first( new int( 42 ) );

    Nonup<int> second( std::move( first ) );

    return 0;
}

Why does g++ 4.7.0 give errors on the move-construction of the variable second? The output of “g++ -std=c++11 main.cpp” follows.

main.cpp: In instantiation of ‘Nonup<T>::Nonup(Nonup<U>&&) [with U = int; T = int]’:
main.cpp:40:43:   required from here
main.cpp:27:37: error: no matching function for call to ‘std::unique_ptr<int, std::default_delete<int> >::unique_ptr(std::remove_reference<Nonup<int>&>::type)’
main.cpp:27:37: note: candidates are:
In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../include/c++/4.7.0/memory:86:0,
                 from main.cpp:1:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../include/c++/4.7.0/bits/unique_ptr.h:164:2: note: template<class _Up, class> std::unique_ptr::unique_ptr(std::auto_ptr<_Up>&&)
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../include/c++/4.7.0/bits/unique_ptr.h:164:2: note:   template argument deduction/substitution failed:
main.cpp:27:37: note:   ‘std::remove_reference<Nonup<int>&>::type {aka Nonup<int>}’ is not derived from ‘std::auto_ptr<_Up>’
In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../include/c++/4.7.0/memory:86:0,
                 from main.cpp:1:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../include/c++/4.7.0/bits/unique_ptr.h:155:2: note: template<class _Up, class _Ep, class> std::unique_ptr::unique_ptr(std::unique_ptr<_Up, _Ep>&&)
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../include/c++/4.7.0/bits/unique_ptr.h:155:2: note:   template argument deduction/substitution failed:
main.cpp:27:37: note:   ‘std::remove_reference<Nonup<int>&>::type {aka Nonup<int>}’ is not derived from ‘std::unique_ptr<_Up, _Ep>’
In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../include/c++/4.7.0/memory:86:0,
                 from main.cpp:1:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../include/c++/4.7.0/bits/unique_ptr.h:142:7: note: std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>::unique_ptr(std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>&&) [with _Tp = int; _Dp = std::default_delete<int>]
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../include/c++/4.7.0/bits/unique_ptr.h:142:7: note:   no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘std::remove_reference<Nonup<int>&>::type {aka Nonup<int>}’ to ‘std::unique_ptr<int, std::default_delete<int> >&&’
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../include/c++/4.7.0/bits/unique_ptr.h:136:17: note: constexpr std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>::unique_ptr(std::nullptr_t) [with _Tp = int; _Dp = std::default_delete<int>; std::nullptr_t = std::nullptr_t]
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../include/c++/4.7.0/bits/unique_ptr.h:136:17: note:   no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘std::remove_reference<Nonup<int>&>::type {aka Nonup<int>}’ to ‘std::nullptr_t’
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../include/c++/4.7.0/bits/unique_ptr.h:130:7: note: std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>::unique_ptr(std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>::pointer, typename std::remove_reference<_To>::type&&) [with _Tp = int; _Dp = std::default_delete<int>; std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>::pointer = int*; typename std::remove_reference<_To>::type = std::default_delete<int>]
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../include/c++/4.7.0/bits/unique_ptr.h:130:7: note:   candidate expects 2 arguments, 1 provided
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../include/c++/4.7.0/bits/unique_ptr.h:125:7: note: std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>::unique_ptr(std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>::pointer, typename std::conditional<std::is_reference<_Dp>::value, _Dp, const _Dp&>::type) [with _Tp = int; _Dp = std::default_delete<int>; std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>::pointer = int*; typename std::conditional<std::is_reference<_Dp>::value, _Dp, const _Dp&>::type = const std::default_delete<int>&]
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../include/c++/4.7.0/bits/unique_ptr.h:125:7: note:   candidate expects 2 arguments, 1 provided
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../include/c++/4.7.0/bits/unique_ptr.h:120:7: note: std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>::unique_ptr(std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>::pointer) [with _Tp = int; _Dp = std::default_delete<int>; std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>::pointer = int*]
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../include/c++/4.7.0/bits/unique_ptr.h:120:7: note:   no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘std::remove_reference<Nonup<int>&>::type {aka Nonup<int>}’ to ‘std::unique_ptr<int, std::default_delete<int> >::pointer {aka int*}’
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../include/c++/4.7.0/bits/unique_ptr.h:114:17: note: constexpr std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>::unique_ptr() [with _Tp = int; _Dp = std::default_delete<int>]
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../include/c++/4.7.0/bits/unique_ptr.h:114:17: note:   candidate expects 0 arguments, 1 provided

Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T09:17:59+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 9:17 am

    You’re trying to initialise m_ptr from the other Nonup, rather than its m_ptr. The move constructor’s initialiser should be:

    m_ptr( std::move( old.m_ptr ) )
                         ^^^^^^
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want something that looks like this http://jsfiddle.net/mazlix/VBzau/3/ But I don't want to have
this is something that i don't want to program, but i was looking for
Q1. I want to grep something like that: grep -Ir --exclude-dir=some*dirs my-text ~/somewhere but
I want something that functions like this: You click on a name such as
I want to start playing with non-relational database, but want something that is popularly
I want something that will receive me the processes details, like I receive with
I am not even sure how to ask this question. I want something that
I want to make something that makes much sense, but I think its not
What a want to do is something like that: declare @id int set @id
I want to have a route that looks something like: www.abc.com/companyName/Controller/Action/Id However, all the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.