Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6245541
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T12:31:30+00:00 2026-05-24T12:31:30+00:00

I want strong enum types. C++0x has this feature but unfortunately they also require

  • 0

I want strong enum types. C++0x has this feature but unfortunately they also require explicit scoping:

enum class E {e1, e2, e3};
E x = E::e1; //OK
E y = e1; //error

Sometimes this is desirable, but sometimes it’s just unnecessarily verbose. The identifiers might be unique enough by themselves or the enum might already be nested inside a class or namespace.

So I’m looking for a workaround. What would be the best way to declare the enum values also in the surrounding scope?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T12:31:30+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 12:31 pm

    If you want the values visible in the surrounding scope, just add a couple of constants:

    enum class E {e1, e2, e3};
    
    const E e1 = E::e1;
    const E e2 = E::e2;
    const E e3 = E::e3;
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want to convert a string representations of few dozen enum types to enum
I have an enum value as a member of a class which I want
If I want to convert between two Enum types, the values of which, I
I want to use an Enum value for the types of VaryByCustom parameters I
I want to pass any enum value to method in utility class and get
I think this has something to do with the whole variance thing, but I
I want to convert an string to an enum type using TValue, I googled
I have model that is a queue of Strings associated with enum types. I'm
I want to use an enum constant for a property value in jackrabbit. However
I have 2 classes and an Enum. One class is a wrapper for the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.