I want this:
[foo() for _ in xrange (100)]
but beautifuller. ?
I want this: [foo() for _ in xrange (100)] but beautifuller. ?
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I’m afraid you’re not gonna get it any prettier than that in Python, except that some people would advise against
_for an “anonymous” variable. This is the Pythonic idiom for doing what you want.(The
_can be considered confusing to novices because it can be mistaken for special syntax. I use it, but only in the “expert parts” of my code. I also encounter it more and more often, but opinion still seems a bit divided on this one.)