Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6056805
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T08:25:05+00:00 2026-05-23T08:25:05+00:00

I want to allow my Class1 to be convertible to Class2 by a type

  • 0

I want to allow my Class1 to be convertible to Class2 by a type conversion operator:

class  Class1     {
public:
    operator Class2() const {
      //....
    }
}

But if I create a Class2 object in the operator implementation, very likely it will not get deleted by the caller. So what is the best way to implement such a feature?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T08:25:05+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 8:25 am

    There only needs to be deletion if you do something crazy like this:

    operator Class2() const
    {
        Class2 *p = new Class2();
        ...
        return *p;
    }
    

    However, the following is fine:

    operator Class2() const
    {
        Class2 c2;
        ...
        return c2;
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want to define a class that supports __getitem__ , but does not allow
If I don't want to allow anyone to create an instance of my class
I want to have a class property that allow for an expression to take
I want to implement a generic method on a generic class which would allow
I have a class with various public properties which I allow users to edit
I'm working on a Rails project where I want to allow users to create
I'm new to Python & Django. I want to allow users to create new
Greeting, I'm using jquery Plugins/Validation library. I want to allow validation on submitting but
class1 *obj=[[class1 alloc]init]; I want to add this object in the NSMutableArray.
I often have a class where I want to allow a functionality to be

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.