Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6140107
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T18:04:30+00:00 2026-05-23T18:04:30+00:00

I want to avoid generating duplicate numbers in my system. CreateNextNumber() will: Find the

  • 0

I want to avoid generating duplicate numbers in my system.

CreateNextNumber() will:

  1. Find the last number created.
  2. Increment the value by one.
  3. Update the value in the database with the new number.

I want to avoid two clients calling this method at the same time. My fear is they will pull the same last number created, increment it by one, and return the duplicate number for both clients.

Questions:

  1. Do I need to use single mode here? I’d rather use Per Call if possible.
  2. The default concurrency mode is single. I don’t understand how Per Call would create multiple instances, yet have a single thread. Does that mean that even though multiple instances are created, only one client at a time can call a method in their instance?
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T18:04:31+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 6:04 pm

    If you use InstanceContextMode.Single and ConcurrentcyMode.Single your service will handle one request at a time and so would give you this feature – however, this issue is better handled in the database

    Couple of options:

    1. make the field that requires the unique number an identity column and the database will ensure no duplicate values
    2. Wrap the incrementing of the control value in a stored procedure that uses isolation level RepeatableRead and read, increment and write in a transaction

    for your questions you might find my blog article on instancing and concurrency useful

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.