Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7576517
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T16:56:28+00:00 2026-05-30T16:56:28+00:00

I want to be able to mark an action on controller to be called

  • 0

I want to be able to mark an action on controller to be called both from ajax calls and via RenderAction. The problem is that both this attributes derive or implement different abstractions. One way out is the next:

[AjaxOnly]
PartialViewResult GetViewAjax(int foo) { return GetView(foo); }
[ChildActionOnly]
PartialViewResult GetView(int foo) { ... }

But this is not neat at all.


The AjaxOnly attribute I am talking about is:

public sealed class AjaxOnlyAttribute : ActionFilterAttribute
{
    #region Public members

    public override void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext filterContext)
    {
        if (filterContext == null)
            throw new ArgumentNullException("filterContext");
        if (filterContext.HttpContext.Request.Headers["X-Requested-With"] != "XMLHttpRequest")
            filterContext.Result = new HttpNotFoundResult();
    }

    #endregion
}

This method is taken from MVC3 futures. An important comment why the condition is not filterContext.HttpContext.Request.IsAjaxRequest() was made by dev team and says the following:

// Dev10 #939671 - If this attribute is going to say AJAX *only*, then we need to check the header
// specifically, as otherwise clients can modify the form or query string to contain the name/value
// pair we're looking for.
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T16:56:29+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 4:56 pm

    This doesn’t make any sense. Those 2 attributes are mutually exclusive. If an action is marked with [ChildActionOnly] it can never be directly accessed by the client using an HTTP request (be it synchronous or asynchronous). So if you want an action to ever be accessible using AJAX, you should never decorate it with the [ChildActionOnly] attribute.

    I don’t know what this [AjaxOnly] attribute is and where it comes from but depending on how it is implemented you might need to tweak it in order to allow child action requests if it relies only on the Request.IsAjaxRequest() method. For example if it is something like this:

    public class AjaxOnlyAttribute : ActionFilterAttribute
    {
        public override void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext filterContext)
        {
            if (!filterContext.HttpContext.Request.IsAjaxRequest())
            {
                filterContext.Result = new HttpNotFoundResult();
            }
        }
    }
    

    you might want to tweak it like this:

    public class AjaxOrChildActionOnlyAttribute : ActionFilterAttribute
    {
        public override void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext filterContext)
        {
            if (!filterContext.HttpContext.Request.IsAjaxRequest() && 
                !filterContext.IsChildAction
            )
            {
                filterContext.Result = new HttpNotFoundResult();
            }
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want to be able to user query strings in this fashion. Domain.com/controller/function?param=5&otherparam=10 In
I want to be able to capture the exception that is thrown when a
I want to be able to do this. MyInterface interface = new ServiceProxyHelper<ProxyType>(); Here's
I want to be able to generate PDF output from my (native) C++ Windows
I have a html form. I want the user to be able to mark
what I want to do is to be able to mount via sshfs some
I want to be able to issue a command like the following: ssh mark
I have an HTML input field that I want the user to be able
I'm using LaTeX and BibTeX for an article, and I want to able to
Want to be able to provide a search interface for a collection of objects

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.