Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6615603
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T20:28:58+00:00 2026-05-25T20:28:58+00:00

I want to be able to store a function in a dictionary with the

  • 0

I want to be able to store a function in a dictionary with the Key being the object type. All functions will accept objects derived from the same base class. I want to be able to convert (based on a registered function) a class into a DbCommand. I’ve listed my code below in the form that seems correct but something is wrong with the syntax, etc. I think I’m missing something really simple… Any help will be greatly appreciated!

private Dictionary<object, Func<TrackingRecord, DbCommand>> conversionFunctions = new Dictionary<object, Func<TrackingRecord, DbCommand>>();


public void RegisterConversionFunction<T>(Func<T, DbCommand> conversionFunction) where T : TrackingRecord
    {
        conversionFunctions.Add(typeof(T), conversionFunction);
    }

public DbCommand GetConverstion<T>(T trackingRecord) where T : TrackingRecord
    {
        DbCommand command = null;

        if (conversionFunctions.ContainsKey(trackingRecord.GetType()))
        {
            Func<T, DbCommand> conversionFunction;
            if (conversionFunctions.TryGetValue(trackingRecord.GetType(), out conversionFunction))
            {
                command = conversionFunction.Invoke(trackingRecord);
            }
        }
        else
        {
            command = DefaultConversion(trackingRecord);
        }
        return command;
    }
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T20:28:59+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 8:28 pm

    The problem with your original solution is that the method signature Func<T, DbCommand> doesn’t match the expected value Func<TrackingRecord, DbCommand>. To fix this, because you know that T is constrained to inherit from TrackingRecord, you can create a wrapping function that matches the expected signature (Func<TrackingRecord, DbCommand>) and cast the argument to T.

    Try this:

    private Dictionary<object, Func<TrackingRecord, DbCommand>> conversionFunctions = new Dictionary<object, Func<TrackingRecord, DbCommand>>();
    
    public void RegisterConversionFunction<T>(Func<T, DbCommand> conversionFunction) where T : TrackingRecord
    {
        conversionFunctions.Add(typeof(T), tr => conversionFunction((T)tr));
    }
    
    public DbCommand GetConverstion<T>(T trackingRecord) where T : TrackingRecord
    {
        DbCommand command = null;
        Func<TrackingRecord, DbCommand> conversionFunction;
    
        if (conversionFunctions.TryGetValue(typeof(T), out conversionFunction))
            command = conversionFunction.Invoke(trackingRecord);
        else
            command = DefaultConversion(trackingRecord);
    
        return command;
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'll be very simple: I want to be able to store Java objects from
I want to be able to store information about a song that has been
I want to be able to store various Canvas items in seperate XAML files
Want to be able to provide a search interface for a collection of objects
I'm writing a matrix class, and I want it to be able to store
I want to be able to store a backgroundcolor for a panel in my
How do I create a Dictionary where I can store functions? Thanks. I have
My motivation for the augmentation of Object is I want to be able to
I have a list that I want to be able to store 20 values.
I attempted to use boost::function<x> wrapper to store and convert my functional objects and

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.