Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 236491
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T20:20:57+00:00 2026-05-11T20:20:57+00:00

I want to be able to templatize a class on a member function without

  • 0

I want to be able to templatize a class on a member function without needing to repeat the arguments of the member function — i e, derive them automatically.
I know how to do this if I name the class based on how many arguments the function takes, but I want to derive that as well.

Something like this, although this doesn’t work (at least in MSVC 2008 sp1, which is my target compiler):

class Foo {
  void func0();
  int func2(char *, float);
};

template<typename T> class Wrapper;

// specialize for zero-argument void func
template<typename Host, void (Host::*Func)()> class Wrapper<Func> : public Base {
  ... specialization goes here ...
};

// specialize for two-argument value func
template<typename Host, typename Ret, typename Arg0, typename Arg1, Ret (Host::*Func)(Arg0, Arg1)> class Wrapper<Func> : public Base {
  ... specialization goes here ...
};

Through “Base” I can then treat these polymorphically. In the end, I want to use this to create a simple wrapper syntax for a scripting language:

WrapClass<Bar> wrap(
  MemberFunction<&Bar::func0>("func0") +
  MemberFunction<&Bar::func2>("func2")
  );

However, that doesn’t work: the specialization syntax is wrong, because you can’t match a function pointer to a typename argument.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T20:20:58+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 8:20 pm

    I believe you’ll need to take a traits approach, the most common library of which is boost’s, but if you wanted to avoid boost, it wouldn’t be extremely difficult to roll your own if you limited the scope of the implementation to just pointer-to-member-functions and the traits on those you need (modern c++ design is a great book explaining the theory). Here’s how I would do it with boost’s function_traits and enable_if.

    You could use a generic template argument, enable_if it for function pointers, then use function types (or type traits) to pull out out the information you need:

    #include <boost/function_types/function_arity.hpp>
    #include <boost/function_types/is_member_pointer.hpp>
    
    template<typename T, class Enable = void> class Wrapper;
    
    /* other specializations... */
    
    // For member functions:
    template <class T>
    class Wrapper<T, typename enable_if<is_member_pointer<T> >::type>
    { /* function_arity<T>::value has the number of arguments */ };
    

    See this and this

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want to be able to do this. MyInterface interface = new ServiceProxyHelper<ProxyType>(); Here's
I want to be able to capture the exception that is thrown when a
I want to be able to do: For Each thing In things End For
I want to be able to play sound files in my program. Where should
I want to be able to make an HTTP call updating some select boxes
I want to be able to view a SQL Server 2005 Reporting Services report
I want to be able to generate PDF output from my (native) C++ Windows
I want to be able to get an estimate of how much code &
I want to be able to get an estimate of how much code &
I want to be able to generate a highly graphical (with lots of text

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.