I want to bind() to my base class’s version of a function from the derived class. The function is marked protected in the base. When I do so, the code compiles happily in Clang (Apple LLVM Compiler 4.1) but gives an error in both g++ 4.7.2 and in Visual Studio 2010. The error is along the lines of: “‘Base::foo’ : cannot access protected member.”
The implication is that the context for the reference is actually within bind(), where of course the function is seen as protected. But shouldn’t bind() inherit the context of the calling function–in this case, Derived::foo()–and therefore see the base method as accessible?
The following program illustrates the issue.
struct Base
{
protected: virtual void foo() {}
};
struct Derived : public Base
{
protected:
virtual void foo() override
{
Base::foo(); // Legal
auto fn = std::bind( &Derived::foo,
std::placeholders::_1 ); // Legal but unwanted.
fn( this );
auto fn2 = std::bind( &Base::foo,
std::placeholders::_1 ); // ILLEGAL in G++ 4.7.2 and VS2010.
fn2( this );
}
};
Why the discrepancy in behavior? Which is correct? What workaround is available for the error-giving compilers?
Answer: see boost::bind with protected members & context which quotes this part of the Standard
Workaround: make
fooapublicmember function