Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6677529
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T04:07:58+00:00 2026-05-26T04:07:58+00:00

I want to call an external program from Python. I have used both Popen()

  • 0

I want to call an external program from Python. I have used both Popen() and call() to do that.

What’s the difference between the two?

My specific goal is to run the following command from Python. I am not sure how redirects work.

./my_script.sh > output

I read the documentation and it says that call() is a convenience function or a shortcut function. Do we lose any power by using call() instead of Popen()?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T04:07:58+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 4:07 am

    There are two ways to do the redirect. Both apply to either subprocess.Popen or subprocess.call.

    1. Set the keyword argument shell = True or executable = /path/to/the/shell and specify the command just as you have it there.

    2. Since you’re just redirecting the output to a file, set the keyword argument

      stdout = an_open_writeable_file_object
      

      where the object points to the output file.

    subprocess.Popen is more general than subprocess.call.

    Popen doesn’t block, allowing you to interact with the process while it’s running, or continue with other things in your Python program. The call to Popen returns a Popen object.

    call does block. While it supports all the same arguments as the Popen constructor, so you can still set the process’ output, environmental variables, etc., your script waits for the program to complete, and call returns a code representing the process’ exit status.

    returncode = call(*args, **kwargs) 
    

    is basically the same as calling

    returncode = Popen(*args, **kwargs).wait()
    

    call is just a convenience function. It’s implementation in CPython is in subprocess.py:

    def call(*popenargs, timeout=None, **kwargs):
        """Run command with arguments.  Wait for command to complete or
        timeout, then return the returncode attribute.
    
        The arguments are the same as for the Popen constructor.  Example:
    
        retcode = call(["ls", "-l"])
        """
        with Popen(*popenargs, **kwargs) as p:
            try:
                return p.wait(timeout=timeout)
            except:
                p.kill()
                p.wait()
                raise
    

    As you can see, it’s a thin wrapper around Popen.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want to call an external program from within python, but this external program
I have a Makefile from which I want to call another external bash script
I'm developing an application that will allow users to call external code from both
I have an ActionScript program that I want to access some external JavaScript functions.
I want to call a c# function from my javascript function. I have a
I want to call a C library from a Python application. I don't want
I want to call AS function from JS. I have the following ActionScript 3
I want to execute a external .exe program from within java. The .exe is
I want to call external urls using cron job of Google App Engine. And
I want to call a function from a .NET DLL (coded in C#) from

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.