Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 895009
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T14:29:22+00:00 2026-05-15T14:29:22+00:00

I want to call an overloaded callback method that can accept several different types

  • 0

I want to call an overloaded callback method that can accept several different types as possible arguments.

string s = "some text";
PerformCallback(s);

int i = 42;
PerformCallback(i);

byte[] ba = new byte[] { 4, 2 };
PerformCallback(ba);

So far no problem. But now I want to have two different kinds of byte arrays, let’s call them blue byte arrays and green byte arrays. The byte arrays themselves are, well, just byte arrays. Their blueness and greeness is only a philosophical concept, but I’d like to write an overloaded callback method that has two different overloads for the two kinds of byte arrays, and a way of invoking the two different overloads. I’d prefer very much to avoid having to use an extra argument to indicate the color of the byte arrays, and I’d prefer to avoid anything that adds an enclosing class or similar that will add runtime overhead.

Any ideas? Thanks in advance.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T14:29:22+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 2:29 pm

    Well, you could create a struct which just contains a byte array, and then possibly have implicit conversions to/from byte[]… that way you end up with separate types for the sake of overloads etc.

    As it’s a struct there would be no overhead in terms of memory – there may well be a very slight overhead involved in running the operator (or just the constructor) but it’s at least likely that the JIT will inline everything to heck anyway. I certainly wouldn’t expect it to have a significant performance impact.

    (To be honest, you could make it an enclosing class and you’d still be unlikely to notice any difference unless this was being used in a tight loop, IMO. Performance bottlenecks are rarely where we expect them to be.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.