Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 383381
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T15:16:38+00:00 2026-05-12T15:16:38+00:00

I want to convert a byte* to a byte[] , but I also want

  • 0

I want to convert a byte* to a byte[], but I also want to have a reusable function to do this:

public unsafe static T[] Create<T>(T* ptr, int length)
{
    T[] array = new T[length];

    for (int i = 0; i < length; i++)
        array[i] = ptr[i];

    return array;
}

Unfortunately I get a compiler error because T might be a “.NET managed type” and we can’t have pointers to those. Even more frustrating is that there is no generic type constraint which can restrict T to “unmanaged types”. Is there a built-in .NET function to do this? Any ideas?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T15:16:38+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 3:16 pm

    The method that could match what you are trying to do is Marshal.Copy, but it does not take the appropriate parameters to make a generic method.

    Although there it is not possible to write a generic method with generic constraints that could describe what is possible, not every type can be allowed to be copied using an “unsafe” way. There are some exceptions; classes are one of these.

    Here is a sample code:

        public unsafe static T[] Create<T>(void* source, int length)
        {
            var type = typeof(T);
            var sizeInBytes =  Marshal.SizeOf(typeof(T));
    
            T[] output = new T[length];
    
            if (type.IsPrimitive)
            {
                // Make sure the array won't be moved around by the GC 
                var handle = GCHandle.Alloc(output, GCHandleType.Pinned);
    
                var destination = (byte*)handle.AddrOfPinnedObject().ToPointer();
                var byteLength = length * sizeInBytes;
    
                // There are faster ways to do this, particularly by using wider types or by 
                // handling special lengths.
                for (int i = 0; i < byteLength; i++)
                    destination[i] = ((byte*)source)[i];
    
                handle.Free();
            }
            else if (type.IsValueType)
            {
                if (!type.IsLayoutSequential && !type.IsExplicitLayout)
                {
                    throw new InvalidOperationException(string.Format("{0} does not define a StructLayout attribute", type));
                }
    
                IntPtr sourcePtr = new IntPtr(source);
    
                for (int i = 0; i < length; i++)
                {
                    IntPtr p = new IntPtr((byte*)source + i * sizeInBytes);
    
                    output[i] = (T)System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.PtrToStructure(p, typeof(T));
                }
            }
            else 
            {
                throw new InvalidOperationException(string.Format("{0} is not supported", type));
            }
    
            return output;
        }
    
        unsafe static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            var arrayDouble = Enumerable.Range(1, 1024)
                                        .Select(i => (double)i)
                                        .ToArray();
    
            fixed (double* p = arrayDouble)
            {
                var array2 = Create<double>(p, arrayDouble.Length);
    
                Assert.AreEqual(arrayDouble, array2);
            }
    
            var arrayPoint = Enumerable.Range(1, 1024)
                                       .Select(i => new Point(i, i * 2 + 1))
                                       .ToArray();
    
            fixed (Point* p = arrayPoint)
            {
                var array2 = Create<Point>(p, arrayPoint.Length);
    
                Assert.AreEqual(arrayPoint, array2);
            }
        }
    

    The method can be generic, but it cannot take a pointer of a generic type. This is not an issue since pointers covariance is helping, but this has the unfortunate effect of preventing an implicit resolution of the generic argument type. You then have to specify MakeArray explicitly.

    I’ve added a special case for the structures, where it is best to have types that specify a struct layout. This might not be an issue in your case, but if the pointer data is coming from native C or C++ code, specifying a layout kind is important (The CLR might choose to reorder fields to have a better memory alignment).

    But if the pointer is coming exclusively from data generated by managed code, then you can remove the check.

    Also, if the performance is an issue, there are better algorithms to copy the data than doing it byte by byte. (See the countless implementations of memcpy for reference)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want to convert a primitive to a string, and I tried: myInt.toString(); This
I want to convert a std::string to lowercase. I am aware of the function
I want to convert an instance of generic IDictionary<,> to non generic IDictionary .
I want to convert a string into a double and after doing some math
I want to convert a number that is in PRTime format (a 64-bit integer
I want to convert a number between 0 and 4096 ( 12-bits ) to
I want to convert an XML document containing many elements within a node (around
I want to convert for example a particular date 12-11-2008 11:33:04.510 to UTC datetime.
I want to convert from char representing a hexadecimal value (in upper or lower
I want to convert a string into a series of Keycodes, so that I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.