Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 824641
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T03:07:42+00:00 2026-05-15T03:07:42+00:00

I want to create a Config class that acts somewhere between a hash and

  • 0

I want to create a “Config” class that acts somewhere between a hash and a tree. It’s just for storing global values, which can have a context.

Here’s how I use it:

Config.get("root.parent.child_b") #=> "value"

Here’s what the class might look like:

class Construct

  def get(path)
    # split path by "."
    # search tree for nodes
  end

  def set(key, value)
    # split path by "."
    # create tree node if necessary
    # set tree value
  end

  def tree
    {
      :root => {
        :parent => {
          :child_a => "value",
          :child_b => "another value"
        },
        :another_parent => {
          :something => {
            :nesting => "goes on and on"
          }
        }
      }
    }
  end

end

Is there a name for this kind of thing, somewhere between Hash and Tree (not a Computer Science major)? Basically a hash-like interface to a tree.

Something that outputs like this:

t = TreeHash.new
t.set("root.parent.child_a", "value")
t.set("root.parent.child_b", "another value")

desired output format:

t.get("root.parent.child_a") #=> "value"
t.get("root") #=> {"parent" => {"child_a" => "value", "child_b" => "another value"}}

instead of this:

t.get("root") #=> nil

or this (which you get the value from by calling {}.value)

t.get("root") #=> {"parent" => {"child_a" => {}, "child_b" => {}}}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T03:07:43+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 3:07 am

    You can implement one in no-time:

    class TreeHash < Hash
      attr_accessor :value
    
      def initialize
        block = Proc.new {|h,k| h[k] = TreeHash.new(&block)}
        super &block
      end
    
      def get(path)
        find_node(path).value
      end
    
      def set(path, value)
        find_node(path).value = value
      end
    
    private
    
      def find_node(path)
        path.split('.').inject(self){|h,k| h[k]}
      end
    end
    

    You could improve implementation by setting unneeded Hash methods as a private ones, but it already works the way you wanted it. Data is stored in hash, so you can easily convert it to yaml.


    EDIT:

    To meet further expectations (and, convert to_yaml by default properly) you should use modified version:

    class TreeHash < Hash
      def initialize
        block = Proc.new {|h,k| h[k] = TreeHash.new(&block)}
        super &block
      end
    
      def get(path)
        path.split('.').inject(self){|h,k| h[k]}
      end
    
      def set(path, value)
        path = path.split('.')
        leaf = path.pop
        path.inject(self){|h,k| h[k]}[leaf] = value
      end
    end
    

    This version is slight trade-off, as you cannot store values in non-leaf nodes.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.