Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8011501
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 4, 20262026-06-04T19:02:11+00:00 2026-06-04T19:02:11+00:00

I want to define interface for serializing variables, where depending on a template argument,

  • 0

I want to define interface for serializing variables, where depending on a template argument, serialization code (true) or nothing (false) is performed. The serialization function is itself templated on archive and variable types.

Is it better to partially specialize serialization function, or specialize class with static method inside? Is the code below correct? Is there a better way?


This is my pseudo-code where I am not sure, whether it would work or not.

The class-approach looks something like this:

template<bool ser>
struct MaybeSerialize;

template<> struct MaybeSerialize<true>{
   template<class ArchiveT, class T>
   static void serialize(ArchiveT& archive, T& var){ /* serialize*/ }
};

template<> struct MaybeSerialize<false>{
   template<class ArchiveT, class T>
   static void serialize(ArchiveT& archive, T& var){ /* do nothing*/ }
};

// call like this
MaybeSerialize<compileTimeBool>::serialize(archive,variable);

The partial specialization would be (the syntax is probably wrong):

template<bool ser, class Archive T, typename T> maybeSerialize(ArchiveT&,T&);
template<class ArchiveT, typename T> maybeSerialize<true>(ArchiveT&,T&){ /* serialize */ }
template<class ArchiveT, typename T> maybeSerialize<false>(ArchiveT&,T&){ /* do nothing */ }
// call like this
maybeSerialize<compileTimeBool>(archive,variable);
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-04T19:02:12+00:00Added an answer on June 4, 2026 at 7:02 pm

    As Pubby already commented it’s not possible to partially specialize template functions in C++, you have to go with class specialization.
    Nevertheless a static if implementation in C++ is pretty simple:

    /**
     * Usual meta-IF
     * Chooses between two template parameters dependent on a given static
     * boolean value.
     *
     *  @tparam b The static boolean value to check
     *  @tparam T The class chosen when b yields true
     *  @tparam E The class chosen when b yields false
     */
    template <bool b, class T, class E>
    struct IF;
    
    /**
     * Specialization for IF<true,T,E>. Chooses T for typedef RET.
     */
    template <class T, class E>
    struct IF<true,T,E> {
       typedef T RET;
    };
    
    /**
     * Specialization for IF<false,T,E>. Chooses E for typedef RET.
     */
    template <class T, class E>
    struct IF<false,T,E> {
       typedef E RET;
    };
    

    (Code taken from Static interfaces in C++, Brian McNamara and Yannis Smaragdakis)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want to define a following function: if(stmtToFinalize) { NSLog(@Finalizing statement stmtToFinalize); if (sqlite3_finalize(stmtToFinalize)
I want to define a constant in objective-c. Previously I had the following function:
Why would I want to define a C++ interface that contains private methods? Even
I want to define an interface MyList which is a list of interface MyThing.
I want to define an interface IFile that includes an array of key/value pairs
I'm trying do define an interface in which I want to plot some values
I want to define a min and max methods in a Utils class. @interface
I want to define injection so that only if the injected interface has EJB
I want to make an interface in C# that defines a method that always
At first sorry my bad English. I want define routing for this url: For

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.