Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 430057
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T19:50:12+00:00 2026-05-12T19:50:12+00:00

I want to do something like: all = [ x for x in t[1]

  • 0

I want to do something like:

all = [ x for x in t[1] for t in tests ]

tests looks like:

[ ("foo",[a,b,c]), ("bar",[d,e,f]) ]

So I want to have the result

all = [a,b,c,d,e,f]

My code does not work, Python says:

UnboundLocalError: local variable 't' referenced before assignment

Is there any simple way to do that?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T19:50:13+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 7:50 pm

    It should work the other way around:

    all = [x for t in tests for x in t[1]]
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want to have a route that looks something like: www.abc.com/companyName/Controller/Action/Id However, all the
I want something like the following: foo.should_receive(:bar).with(an_instance_of(Bla))..... Is this possible? Edit: According to the
Hay guys, i want to use something like this users = User.objects.all() but i
I want to replace all displaying text with something like @@@@. It mean user
I want to delete all rows in a datatable. I use something like this:
I want to retrieve declared SVG attributes programmatically. It's all inline content, something like
So I have a class that looks something like the following: public class MyClass
I have a git repository set up that looks something like this: PROD /
I have examples like this in my spec file: it does something, :separate=> true
I want something like the following but would like it to be reusable for

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.