Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 965963
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T02:05:01+00:00 2026-05-16T02:05:01+00:00

I want to do something like this public class Class1 { public Class1() {

  • 0

I want to do something like this

public class Class1
    {
       public Class1()
       {

       }
       public Class1(int a)
       {

       }
    }
   public class Class2 :Class1
    {
       public Class2(int a)
       {

       }
       public Class2(): base(2)
       {
         this(2);   // new Class2(2);
       }

    }

I know this can’t be achieved in Java (can use one between (super or this) in the first line)

But somehow I am in need of this kind of work how to achieve that? Means calling the base class’s parameterised and derived class’s parameterised constructor in default constructor of derived class.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T02:05:02+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 2:05 am

    MSDN article on constructors is pretty good. Here are some relevant bits:

    A constructor can use the base keyword
    to call the constructor of a base
    class.
    ….
    A constructor can invoke another
    constructor in the same object using
    the this keyword. Like base, this can
    be used with or without parameters,
    and any parameters in the constructor
    are available as parameters to this,
    or as part of an expression.

    This should work:

    public class Class1
    {
       public Class1()
       {
    
       }
       public Class1(int a)
       {
    
       }
    }
    public class Class2 :Class1
    {
       public Class2(int a) : base(a)
       {
    
       }
       public Class2(): this(2)
       {
       }
    
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm trying to create a base class for my POCO objects in .NET 4,
I have a templated class that performs an action on the class that is
Basically, I want the C# compiler functionality of its override keyword in my C++
Is the passing by reference of a private variable in a class to be
I am trying to convert a macro in C to something that would work
I have an object, and before I serialize it to Json, I'd like to
Not sure how to describe this for sure, but I think I've boiled down
I am using entity framework with a web service and I have entity partial
Is there a (practical) way to by-pass the normal (virtual) constructor calling order? Example:
You may have run into situations wherein you declare a certain enum and you

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.