Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 891579
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T13:54:47+00:00 2026-05-15T13:54:47+00:00

I want to do something like this: public static TResult MyCast<TSource, TResult>(TSource item) {

  • 0

I want to do something like this:

public static TResult MyCast<TSource, TResult>(TSource item)
{
    return (TResult)item;
}

Without restrictions on TSource or TResult and avoiding unnecessary boxing if possible.
Edit: I want to stress out, that I want a simple casting of types, not elaborate type conversion here. It would be perfectly ok to fail at casting, say string to int.

Is there any sane way to do this using CLR 2.0?

Edit: this is a simplified version, so it’s pretty useless, yes.
But consider casting generic collections, such as this:

public static Dictionary<string, TResult> CastValues<TSource, TResult>(this Dictionary<string, TSource> dictionary)

After some discussions with my co-workers, it seems like there’s no simple way to implement such a feature (if at all possible), so I’m stuck with code bloat of several very simple methods for different situations (i.e. up- and downcast of reference types and casting of some value types) 🙁

Too bad I can’t use .NET 4.0 with all it’s dynamic et al goodness.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T13:54:48+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 1:54 pm

    This is straightforward when TSource and TResult are both reference types.

    If one or the other are value types, how do you want it to work? Value types can’t inherit from each other, so it’s not a matter of doing an up- or down-cast. You might expect numeric conversions between, say, int and double, but you’d have to code these yourself: .NET doesn’t treat them as typecasts. And conversion between, say, DateTime and string involves more intelligence (what format? which culture? etc.).

    If you’re just handling reference types then this method can be a one-liner. If you want to handle value types as well then you’ll need to write special case code for the various combinations.

    Edit: Convert.ChangeType does a reasonable job at encapsulating the various conversions between value types. However you mentioned you’re keen not to introduce boxing: Convert.ChangeType isn’t generic and it takes an object.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want to do something like this but C# doesn't accept this: public static
I want to achieve something like this in C# 3.5: public void Register<T>() :
I want something like this: <msxsl:script language=C#> ??? getNodes() { ... return ... }
When i do something like this: public static void BindData<T>(this System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlCollection controls, T bind)
I am thinking about something like this: public static <T extends Comparable<T>> T minOf(T...ts){
I want to write in java something like this: public class MyMatcher { public
I have seen an implementation of Factory using static methods. Something like this: public
I have something like this : class ParentClass { public static const ON_SOME_EVT:String =
i want something like this the user enter a website link i need check
I want do something like this: Result = 'MyString' in [string1, string2, string3, string4];

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.