Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 138969
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T07:21:04+00:00 2026-05-11T07:21:04+00:00

I want to do this: If there’s a module X containing a function Y

  • 0

I want to do this: ‘If there’s a module X containing a function Y then call it, otherwise don’t.’

I’m aware that I can use CallByName(Object, MethodName, ...) to call a method or property of an object instance.

Is it possible to call a global sub/function which is not bound to an object?

//Module1 Public Sub DoSomething End Sub  //Module2 Public Sub TriggerDoSomething   On Error Resume Next   CallByName2 'Module1', 'DoSomething', ... End Sub 

I know, it would be better to refactor my code to wrap DoSomething into a class, but currently this is not possible as it would break the code of my coworkers in a way that could not be fixed in a few hours.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T07:21:05+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 7:21 am

    It really would be easier to CallByName a class – can’t you just wrap the module(s) with a class that redirects the calls to the module?

    It’s possible to call routines in modules by name using a FunctionDelegator. This is explained in Matt Curland’s excellent book Advanced Visual Basic 6.

    Googling might find you some hacks using CallWindowProc, but Matt Curland says that’s dangerous. Which is pretty much the final word on the matter 🙂


    EDIT: RS Conley’s answer doesn’t use a module, use a class that has a instancing property of GlobalMultiUse and you will be able to use CallByName. This will work if your code is in a DLL rather than an EXE. RS Conley suggests in any case it is more flexible to have a minimal EXE with nearly all functionality in a DLL: this may well be true.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 169k
  • Answers 169k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Actually, if you look more closely, DateInterval really DOESN'T have… May 12, 2026 at 1:55 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I would maintain this within a separate table. If you… May 12, 2026 at 1:55 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I had the same scenario. The solution is rather simple.… May 12, 2026 at 1:55 pm

Related Questions

I am currently running into a problem where an element is coming back from
I want to do this: If there's a module X containing a function Y
I am wondering if there is some way to change a CSS attribute for
I've been experimenting with using MS Excel 2007 to edit tabular data stored in
I have a question about custom authorization in MVC. I have a site that

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.