I want to encode tags that will contain a field number and a wire type for the purpose of protocol buffers. The problem that I am having now is that whenever my value for ‘tag’ is below ‘8’ fprintf writes additional values next to the correct ones. i.e. instead of 38 it prints 38c0 3. If the value of tag is 8 or higher the script works fine. Below is the code with irrelavent lines omitted.
int uint32_pack (uint8_t *fieldnumber, uint32_t value, uint8_t *out);
int main(){
uint32_t initvalue = 2;
int return_rv;
uint8_t *tag = (uint8_t *) malloc(sizeof(uint8_t));
uint8_t *tempout= (uint8_t *) malloc(sizeof(uint32_t));
*tag = 7; //value to be encoded (won't work for values less than 8)
return_rv = uint32_pack (tag, initvalue, tempout);
free(tempout);
}
/* === pack() === */
/* Pack an unsigned 32-bit integer in base-128 encoding, and return the number
of bytes needed: this will be 5 or less. */
int uint32_pack (uint8_t *fieldnumber, uint32_t value, uint8_t *out)
{
unsigned rv = 0;
FILE *wiretypetag;
int secondaryvalue;
wiretypetag = fopen("wiretype.txt","w");
//encodes wire type and the field number
if (*fieldnumber <16){
*fieldnumber <<= 3;
fprintf(wiretypetag,"%x",fieldnumber[0]);
}
if (*fieldnumber < 32 && *fieldnumber > 15){
*fieldnumber <<= 3;
secondaryvalue = 0x01;
fprintf(wiretypetag,"%x %x",fieldnumber[0],secondaryvalue);
}
if (*fieldnumber < 48 && *fieldnumber > 31){
*fieldnumber += 0x10;
*fieldnumber &= 0x1F;
*fieldnumber <<= 3;
secondaryvalue = 0x02;
fprintf(wiretypetag,"%x %x",fieldnumber[0], secondaryvalue);
}
if (*fieldnumber < 64 && *fieldnumber > 47){
*fieldnumber &= 0x1F;
*fieldnumber <<= 3;
secondaryvalue = 0x03;
fprintf(wiretypetag,"%x %x",fieldnumber[0], secondaryvalue);
}
/* assert: value<128 */
out[rv++] = value;
if (rv == 1){
fprintf(outfile,"%x",out[0]);
}
if (rv == 2){
fprintf(outfile,"%x %x",out[0], out[1]);
}
if (rv == 3){
fprintf(outfile,"%x %x %x",out[0],out[1],out[2]);
}
if (rv == 4){
fprintf(outfile,"%x %x %x %x",out[0],out[1],out[2],out[3]);
}
if (rv == 5){
fprintf(outfile,"%x %x %x %x %x",out[0],out[1],out[2],out[3],out[4]);
}
fclose(wiretypetag);
return rv;
}
You can simplify the code by using
elseat:Replace with:
This is a common idiom and one you should use when appropriate – as now. It will improve the legibility of the code.
That may not be the whole problem; it probably isn’t.Explanation of Problem
In fact, using an
else ifchain corrects the code. Because the firstifmodifies*fieldnumberwith the<<=operator, when the second condition is evaluated,*fieldnumberis no longer 7 but 56, so the condition foris also executed, printing out more information.
The
else ifchain will resolve that by ensuring that only one alternative is executed.Since you have:
This
fprintf()should be executed, but the following ones forrvequal to 2, 3, 4, 5 should never be executed.